Home > Branding > General counsels prefer fake law firms over real ones

General counsels prefer fake law firms over real ones

Fake Law firm brands

A study conducted by Danish PR executive, Nic. Rossen, who interviewed 50 business managers on the brand perception of US management consultancies vs. US corporate law firms.
With thanks to our partners from LegalBusinessWorld who published this interview with Nic. Rossen on their Dutch website

Big Law lacks branding

Can well-crafted press coverage persuade business managers abroad to perceive and prefer fake corporate law firms over real ones promoted by advertising? And is prior knowledge a determining factor? Yes, a new study conducted among Danish business managers suggests, arguing that US law firms suffer from a dangerous case of “bad branding” overseas.

Andersson & Cooper Associates, Reagan Rove Coolidge, JMM Global. Sounds familiar? If yes, it’s because they’re engineered to do so: These alleged corporate law firms and 3 other “management consultancies” were purposely invented for a new study conducted by a Danish PR executive, who interviewed 50 business managers and general counsels on the brand perception of US management consultancies vs. US corporate law firms.

According to the study, the average manager had 79 subordinates, with 66% of the managers identifying as being in either top management or top management and owner/co-ownership of their respective organisations, with 46% of these companies turning over more than $5M/year. Thus with testimonies from a potentially relevant target group for American lawyers seeking to expand business abroad, the study reached some fairly remarkable conclusions: “The notion I had from our business, was that while US management consultancies have been great at promoting brands abroad to senior level executives, US lawyers have not. This we found evidence of”, says Nic. Rossen, who spent months conducting the study in early 2015 with Universitat Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona and The University of Stirling, Scotland, while simultaneously being the head of PR-consultancy Rossen & Company in Copenhagen, which specialises namely in branding professional services firms like law firms and management consultancies.

From blue stamp to blue chip

The evidence was found conducting a series of experiments, exhibiting ads from some of the world’s largest law firms and management consultancies back-2-back with forged press coverage on invented firms of both law and management consultancy with names spun out of popular culture, asking the subjected business managers to rate their brand perception on a scale from one to ten.
“I basically just thought of the most ridiculous cases and names I could come up with. One firm I called JMM Global and their lead attorney Jim McGill (i.e. AMC’s Saul Goodman), added creative copy and The Washington Post’s logo. Voilá, prime press coverage. »

Big Law lacks branding

Fake Washington Post article

In line with Rossen’s predictions, subjects spectacularly displayed a higher mean perception of the fake law firms promoted by forged press coverage (6,1/10) than the real ones promoted by actual advertisements (5,65/10). “In the case of the Saul Goodman-inspired JMM Global, this wound up being slightly higher perceived than NYC-powerhouse Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom and a tad more preferred than DLA Piper – one of the highest grossing law firms in the world”, Rossen says.

Yet still, subjects consequently held the real management consultancies promoted by advertising in higher mean regard (7,86/10) than the fakes promoted by forged press coverage (5,82/10): “We found that the third-party credibility lent by press coverage renders corporate entities blue chip with publics which do not hold prior brand knowledge. This is US big law’s core problem; very few know them abroad, why the fakes win with foreign audiences, whereas management consultancies such as McKinsey, Bain and BCG have become household brands and therefore stand the test”, says Nic. Rossen.

Lawyers are “brand Neanderthals”

Concerning the idea behind the study, the experiment turned out much to the surprise of Rossen: “The funny thing was that I thought I was about to prove that press coverage is generically a better way than advertising to brand professional services firms, but ended up suggesting two other things: 1. Press coverage persuades better than advertising with unknown brands 2. Lawyers are brand Neanderthals. They should rely on press coverage to coin their brand as the Best Brand in Business – or BBB as I would like to phrase it.”

Arguing the side of the devil’s advocate, however, one would argue that management consultants are more globally-oriented than law firms, which have traditionally been tied to local legislation. According to Nic. Rossen’s research, however, this perception is dangerously out of date: “Law firms have been inherently national, but clients are increasingly global. This paradigm-shift will become a game changer for law firms, which historically have been reluctant to invest in brand building. Ask your friends: How many can actually articulate a large law brand in comparison to those that can articulate a large management consultancy? The problem is simple: Big law lacks branding.”

Lawyers: learn from management consultancies

Emulating management consultancies’ brand building, however, Rossen believes corporate law firms are in for a treat: “Management consultants and corporate lawyers are not that different: They both sell knowhow at a similar premium price, and the two industries’ top firms both have single-digit billion dollar turnovers. Management consultants, however, tend to gross more as they are more globally oriented and creative as per the nature of their business, and their brands are promoted throughout the world rather than in partnership with local firms, which lawyers can learn a lot from.”
While Nic. Rossen stresses that not all results can be concluded with statistical significance due to the relatively small sample size surveyed, he believes the study calls for more in-depth research and debate concerning the global branding of US law firms, which he believes will be paramount in tackling problems of the next frontier: “With the democratisation of business knowledge through the internet, the need to ask consultants is consequently reducing”, he says, arguing that global competition is about to reach a whole new level: “Lawyers have historically benefitted from exclusivity in practise, making it both a lucrative business and one of the few professions, which haven’t been disrupted – yet. This could very well happen in the coming years, and the first to fail -come the Uber of law firms- will be the ones, which have not secured their brand game. You really need to be thought of as in pole position, top of mind in thought-leadership. You need to become the Best Brand in Business in the minds of business managers and general counsels if you want to survive as an increasingly global corporate law firm.”

Fake press coverage

Fake article in The Times

An experimental study of how publicity impacts perception and preference, forging the best brands in business of corporate law and management consultancy was written by Nic. Rossen for a joint MSc.-dissertation with Universitat Pompeu Fabra and University of Stirling in Strategic Communications and Public Relationssupervised by Dr. Frederic Guerrero-Solé and submitted on July 24 2015.

Deze post is ook beschikbaar in: FR

Bekijk ook
path to purchase legal consumer
Hoe advocaten zich moeten aanpassen aan de nieuwe juridische consument. Deel 2
path to purchase legal consumer
Hoe advocaten zich moeten aanpassen aan de nieuwe juridische consument. Deel 1
Wijzigende rol van de advocaat
Gerben Pauwels, Directeur Juridische Zaken Argenta, over trends in legal marketing zoals gezien door bedrijfsjuristen (nr. 5).
Jureca
Jureca: Waar rechtszoekenden en advocaten elkaar vinden

Geef feedback op